The Iron Rail blog has a compelling post dating back almost a year on Fred Radtke aka Gray Ghost, who is notorious for painting over New Orleans spray can art and other forms of graffiti as well as conventional signs and posters.It was signed under the pseudonym, "the mighty d-block" and is written under the assumption that Radtke himself is a "writer" who "gets up". While this is certainly a rather unconventional way to think about Radtke, d-block fails to realize that one can't apply graf writer categories and logic to an activity that is in opposition to the basis and politics of graffiti and graffiti art. This should be obvious, and for a blog with anarchist sensibilities I'm pretty surprised to see an individual endorsement of what we would consider as antithetical to anti-racism and is instead an activity that is complicit with the State and essentially white supremacist if not outright fascist.
For those interested in our general appreciation of graffiti, check out LBoogie's post from last March. LBoogie writes, "graffiti has been the megaphone for working class youth, and all they need is a can of spray paint and a blank surface (and sometimes not even that)." Youth of color were at the forefront of a specific form of graffiti in NYC in the 70s that eventually had a global spread. This was more or less consistent with the growth of hip-hop and its corresponding ethos of opposition to neoliberalism, white supremacy, and the coming to power of the Rainbow Coalition.
While we would disagree with those who have tried to mechanically fit graffiti into explicit attacks on the State and capitalism, we still would argue that implicit in graffiti (and sometimes explicit) is a rejection of official society. More importantly than its negativity (negation) is its reclamation of individuality in a society that has sought to destroy any vestige of such in the name of value production and State power.
What the individual writer thinks of his or herself is unimportant; our consciousness is a contradictory thing. Some writers are not able to articulate why they get up. It is a compulsion they feel. But when taken as a totality with all other forms of graffiti, we see a critique and an expression of alienation. Who knows where Radtke's real sentiments lay. I'm pretty confident that he would be in good company with the Algiers Point white community who during Katrina murdered at least a dozen black men with impunity. The State has yet to investigate, let alone charge anyone with the murders. But perhaps Radtke is a dude that generally has no problems with black folks. After all, he is pretty indiscriminate on what he chooses to paint over. However, Radtke is not an island and we have to situate him in a historical context in order to understand what he and his actions represent.
We know how the State has continued to respond to graffiti in explicit attacks on people of color. This goes back as far as Orange Crush. But it was not the only organized force to respond to graffiti. There has also been a history of white vigilantes responding in their own ways. Of course, white vigilantes have been doing more than just responding to graffiti, but have a long history of attacking people of color under the guise of "fighting crime".
Like the racist Katrina shooting deaths, Radtke gets a free pass by the State to continue his political crusade, Operation: Clean Sweep. "Sgt. Joe Narcisse with the NOPD previously said they have no intention of stopping Radtke or charging him with destruction of private property.
'What he’s doing is work that the city would be doing itself provided we had the resources and manpower,' Narcisse said. 'He’s not doing anything that we aren’t asking him to do.'"
I'm not sure which is more frightening, the fact that the white supremacist State turns its head from Radtke, or that it says it doesn't have the resources to remove graffiti itself.
Radtke's activity is more consistent with white vigilantism. He's determined, because the State is unwilling, to fight the depraved colored hordes who have brought us down from national greatness. He is an "Omega Man" that locates the decay and barbarism of the world not in the attacks on the working class and people of color, but on people of color themselves. That is an instinct towards fascism.
To support Radtke for "getting up" isn't breaking the holy laws of hip-hop graffiti. I could give a fuck about that. But to frame Radtke as a graf artist, or to argue that somehow what he is doing is compatible with the general ethos of graffiti, is like confounding the murder of black men by those crackers in Algiers Point as fighting crime. I'm not trying to bait d-block, but just because Huey Long railed against capitalism, that didn't make him anti-racist.
Radtke's a racist, no doubt about it. The previous post on him linked to an article that profiles him trolling through New Orleans "explaining" what each tag and graf symbolized. Even reading the article, it was blatantly obvious that he had no idea what he was talking about and was just working from out-of-touch assumptions that graffiti's only created by crackheads and gangstas. If he's a graf writer, then why does he view his supposed craft as a magnet for drugs and violence instead of as a legit expression of where the kids are at.
ReplyDeleteThe ghost of a supposition that I would ever support anything analogous to "fighting crime" in any context whatsoever is alarming. I'm pro-crime; crime is an expression of social inequality. The exception is when people I like get hurt; those specific crimes are demonstrations of patriarchy. By liking no-one, I stifle patriarchy.
ReplyDeleteThere is a lot of good stuff in this essay you wrote, and in this blog generally. Your analysis of Radtke (and the context you place his actions in) is useful and illuminating. It's true, Radtke is a gun-toting white vigilante with a proven penchant for violence.
That said, the clearest angle for wrapping one's head 'round Radtke is probably class rather than race. It's about money... Private property, & who has the right to "say" and "be" where: the giant McDonald's billboard casting its shadow over the playground.
Shit goes down when Fred bumps up against the really real rich folks, French Quarter property owners horrified at having his signature blotches on their easter-egg paintjobs. Fred even got arrested not too long ago, hit with the same Trespassing and Vandalism charges so familiar to other graf artists... that's some funhouse mirror stuff, ennit? National Guardsmen cuffed him up at the behest of a property owner.
Interest in Radtke is cyclical. I have a new different theory about him that will be along when the stars are right.
Wasn't "Triksta" a terrible book? It fucked up my wince muscles. We should all take deadly warning.
MMFCL
my "word verification" word was
ReplyDelete'dranker'
ha ha ha! Whatchy'all know about THAT?!
2009 was a real good Carnival...
D,
ReplyDeleteI think your piece would stand alone as good satire. Some actually suggested that that is what it was. But knowing that you take it seriously is what is the most bothersome.
Your "class" approach drowns out the potentially fascist character of Radtke's activities. The State has indeed not taken a unanimous stand on his painting as we've seen with some law enforcement officials opposing him when he covers over commissioned work (sometimes), and supporting him on the basis that the city doesn't have the funding to cover it up themselves.
And I agree with you that Radtke does run up against the New Orleans elite, but that is why I made the allusion to Huey Long and to fascism generally that its appeal is in its attack of bourgeois society. But that doesn't mean we should support it.
I would also say that to pose this problem as "a class not a race thing" doesn't help us much. When has capitalism not been white supremacist? Capitalism's power (among other things) is in the competition among wage labor which has always manifested on racial/national terms (again, without this fascism wouldn't have been a possibility). The working class is not just a homogeneous thing, it is broken up by varying castes within the class.
I don't necessarily want this to turn into an abstract conversation about capitalism, but merely to make the point that there can never be a discussion about class that doesn't take up the racial and national dynamics inside of it.
Especially in this cracker ass city. :)